Verified app comparison
Grass vs PacketStream
Compare verified structured facts for Grass and PacketStream, including earning model, platforms, payout information and verification dates.
| Field | Grass | PacketStream |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bandwidth sharing rewards | Bandwidth sharing / residential proxy network |
| Minimum payout | Not currently verified | $5 |
| Supported platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, Chrome extension | Windows, macOS, Linux (Docker) |
| Payout methods | Eligible Grass reward distributions may include Grass Tokens or USDC | PayPal |
| Testing status | not-tested | not-tested |
| Last verified | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-21 |
Grass
Grass tracks contributions from sharing unused internet bandwidth using uptime and network points, which can factor into eligible reward distributions.
Rewards depend on factors such as time available, connection quality, location and actual bandwidth use; eligibility and reward amounts are not guaranteed.
View verified app recordPacketStream
PacketStream's Packeter client routes customer traffic through a user's internet connection and credits eligible traffic at the provider's published per-GB rate.
Current provider pages state $0.10 per GB of eligible routed traffic; actual earnings depend on customer traffic routed through the connection.
View verified app recordSources used by these records
Grass
Last verified: 2026-09-21
PacketStream
Last verified: 2026-09-21